Arkhitsyn

Verifiable Decisions as a Product

Every important decision in a project is first recorded with its alternatives and the reason it was chosen — then a separate, independent review hunts for the error in it before the decision ever turns into code or a contract.

Who needs this today

The market is already delegating real work to agents — and already demanding an accounting for it

This is exactly the kind of decision-origin transparency the industry already knows how to measure: teams running agents in production succeed at "AI or human" attribution several times more often than teams without them.

The solution

An order of work where every decision is verifiable — like bookkeeping

Arkhitsyn is a rule for working with an AI assistant on a project: every important decision is first recorded with its alternatives and the reason it was chosen, and then a separate "second pair of eyes" (also AI) hunts for the error in it before the decision turns into code or a contract. As a result, the project's history always shows what was proposed, what was rejected, and why — not just what came out in the end.

Not in Agile, not in Scrum, not in Waterfall, not in Kanban, not in PRINCE2, not in PMBOK 7 does this trio appear together as a mandatory protocol for a single record. That is the product.

Evidence — the method already works

Minutes to a fix, not a sprint and not a stage

15 min from a recorded decision to finding and fixing a factual error in it (ptv pilot)
~10 min from spotting an inaccurate quote to a rewritten rule with its result confirmed on the very next run (geo-smm pilot)
4h 10min from an empty folder to the first live, human-confirmed game loop — 3D board, AI opponent, build (Gomoku pilot)

By comparison: the "what went wrong — let's correct it" review in PRINCE2 and Scrum happens, by definition, once per stage or once per sprint (Scrum Guide 2020: a retrospective once a month for a month-long sprint). In arkhitsyn, that same review happens at every step of the pipeline.

Who writes where — every role in its own lane, with no overlap.

flowchart LR
    subgraph Agents["Agents (role = owner of its own card)"]
        AG["its own findings,
new questions,
progress
on ITS OWN task"] end subgraph Dispatcher["Coordinating process"] DI["task status,
who's driving,
decision → proposed"] end subgraph Navigator["project map"] NAV["state,
log,
summaries"] end subgraph Human["Human"] HU["everything;
the only one who sets
decision → accepted"] end Agents -.->|"never touches another
task or the maps"| Dispatcher Dispatcher -.->|"never touches accepted"| Human Navigator -.->|"never touches task content"| Agents
Evidence — a shipped product

WUXIN: X-ELEMENTALS — not a pilot, a shipped application

Five board games in one app (Gomoku, Dots, Go, Reversi, Pyramid) with 3D rendering via three.js, for desktop and mobile platforms — built with the very same method described above, from the first recorded decision to the public build.

This description came up inside the team verbatim: "a finished product that should be moving from development into marketing" — and that is exactly the direction WUXIN is heading in next.

Market

From market size to a real capture point

$5.4–9.9B enterprise AI agent tools market, 2026 (Grand View Research / MarketsAndMarkets)
$0.8–1.5B share of organizations actually delegating delivery work to agents (≈15.5%)
$8–77M a realistic 3-year capture point with investment

Growth today runs through package licensing plus hands-on rollout support — exactly how every current pi-space pilot already operates. Investment unlocks the next rung of scale: a network of certified partners (modeled on the Claude Partner Network) and a platform that turns rollout support from the coordinator's own hands-on work into a service.

StepReadiness
Package license (install.sh)live today
Consulting rolloutlive today
Partner certificationnext rung — investment
SaaS platformnext rung — investment
Distribution

Three channels — from organic reach to a ready-made partner network

ChannelPartner commissionLTV:CAC
Organic (word of mouth, communities)—6.5:1
Integrator partner (rolls out and supports)20–25% recurring on the support fee5.0–5.3:1

Both figures sit above the B2B SaaS industry median (3.2–4.1:1, Aleph/Benchmarkit 2026). The organic channel is what every current pilot already grows on; the partner channel is the next wave of growth, with its commission base already fixed in advance.

Where we're headed

Investment means concrete next steps, not abstract growth

The method already works and has been measured across more than a dozen pilots. Investment doesn't fix the method — it builds distribution around it: partners, platform, brand.

Next step

One pilot — and you'll see the method on your own work

Arkhitsyn rolls out on a real piece of work in weeks, not months: no new software for the team, with the first verifiable decision record landing already in the first cycle.

Request a pilot