Every important decision in a project is first recorded with its alternatives and the reason it was chosen — then a separate, independent review hunts for the error in it before the decision ever turns into code or a contract.
—Portfolio leads and PMOs are accountable for tying AI spend to results and for distinguishing AI work from human work in reporting to the board. A survey of 300 senior PMO leaders (Tempo/Potloc, June 2026) names this the top-priority KPI of the current year.
—CTOs and VPs of Engineering at companies that have already moved past the pilot stage (43% of enterprise codebases in 2026 versus 12% in 2024) measure productivity and oversight at the same time: 89% report a productivity gain, and that very same wave is turning oversight of AI output into a visible line item on the engineering leader's own KPIs.
—Both profiles need not one more status-tracking system, but a structural record of who proposed what, what was rejected, and why — something that can be handed to an auditor, a board, or a client without retelling the conversation.
This is exactly the kind of decision-origin transparency the industry already knows how to measure: teams running agents in production succeed at "AI or human" attribution several times more often than teams without them.
Arkhitsyn is a rule for working with an AI assistant on a project: every important decision is first recorded with its alternatives and the reason it was chosen, and then a separate "second pair of eyes" (also AI) hunts for the error in it before the decision turns into code or a contract. As a result, the project's history always shows what was proposed, what was rejected, and why — not just what came out in the end.
01Alternatives and the criteria for judging them are fixed before the choice is made — there is no way to retroactively fit the decision to an answer already settled on.
02A separate role that took no part in the decision independently reviews it for concrete factual errors — not a rubber stamp, but an active search for a named defect.
03The decision log only ever grows downward: an error is never erased by an edit, it is acknowledged in a new entry next to the old one — history is never rewritten.
Not in Agile, not in Scrum, not in Waterfall, not in Kanban, not in PRINCE2, not in PMBOK 7 does this trio appear together as a mandatory protocol for a single record. That is the product.
By comparison: the "what went wrong — let's correct it" review in PRINCE2 and Scrum happens, by definition, once per stage or once per sprint (Scrum Guide 2020: a retrospective once a month for a month-long sprint). In arkhitsyn, that same review happens at every step of the pipeline.
—CI/CD for several game builds (github-deploy pilot) reached a green three-platform build within three rounds in a single day — macOS 1m15s, Windows 3m29s, Ubuntu 1m42s.
—The method writes its own new rules in response to what it finds: verbatim-quote discipline, mandatory independent review of the coordinator's decisions, carrying a verified fact forward into reusable knowledge — every rule emerged inside the project itself, none was planned in advance.
Who writes where — every role in its own lane, with no overlap.
flowchart LR
subgraph Agents["Agents (role = owner of its own card)"]
AG["its own findings,
new questions,
progress
on ITS OWN task"]
end
subgraph Dispatcher["Coordinating process"]
DI["task status,
who's driving,
decision → proposed"]
end
subgraph Navigator["project map"]
NAV["state,
log,
summaries"]
end
subgraph Human["Human"]
HU["everything;
the only one who sets
decision → accepted"]
end
Agents -.->|"never touches another
task or the maps"| Dispatcher
Dispatcher -.->|"never touches accepted"| Human
Navigator -.->|"never touches task content"| Agents
Five board games in one app (Gomoku, Dots, Go, Reversi, Pyramid) with 3D rendering via three.js, for desktop and mobile platforms — built with the very same method described above, from the first recorded decision to the public build.
—The Android build is actually built and published as a GitHub Release — downloadable by direct link today.
—618+ automated tests green, a clean type check, all five games run through live by hand in both themes across every input method — tap, wheel, right-click, shift-click, two-finger gesture.
—The build was verified beyond CI's own green status: the package was unpacked by hand, and the presence of the specific fix in question was personally confirmed in its code.
This description came up inside the team verbatim: "a finished product that should be moving from development into marketing" — and that is exactly the direction WUXIN is heading in next.
Growth today runs through package licensing plus hands-on rollout support — exactly how every current pi-space pilot already operates. Investment unlocks the next rung of scale: a network of certified partners (modeled on the Claude Partner Network) and a platform that turns rollout support from the coordinator's own hands-on work into a service.
| Step | Readiness |
|---|---|
| Package license (install.sh) | live today |
| Consulting rollout | live today |
| Partner certification | next rung — investment |
| SaaS platform | next rung — investment |
—Dedicated communities — r/ClaudeAI (1.06M members), r/ClaudeCode (≈387K), r/LocalLLaMA (806K) — the exact people working with agentic development every day.
—Dedicated industry summits (AI Engineer Code Summit, Agentic AI Summit) — the attendee list is already filtered by the organizers down to actual decision-makers.
—Claude Partner Network — a ready-made network of 150,000+ certified consultants and 40,000+ enrolled firms (Accenture, Deloitte, PwC, KPMG, Slalom, Tribe AI, Turing), launched by Anthropic in March 2026 with a $100M fund for training and go-to-market.
| Channel | Partner commission | LTV:CAC |
|---|---|---|
| Organic (word of mouth, communities) | — | 6.5:1 |
| Integrator partner (rolls out and supports) | 20–25% recurring on the support fee | 5.0–5.3:1 |
Both figures sit above the B2B SaaS industry median (3.2–4.1:1, Aleph/Benchmarkit 2026). The organic channel is what every current pilot already grows on; the partner channel is the next wave of growth, with its commission base already fixed in advance.
→A network of certified partners. The commission band (10–15% per referral, 20–25% recurring for rollout) is already set — the first partners inside the Claude Partner Network will turn it from a modeled figure into a measured practice.
→Platform. The methodology's harnesses and validator are command-line tools today; the next step is deploying the same capability as a service with its own interface, available with no installation.
→First contract. It turns customer acquisition cost from an estimate into a measured figure — and sharpens the economics of every channel beyond the band shown on this page.
→Expanding the evidence base. Every new pi-space pilot (more than a dozen today) adds one more measured data point alongside the minutes and hours already shown — WUXIN proved the method reaches all the way to a public, downloadable result, not only an internal pilot.
→The Arkhitsyn trademark. Registering the name is the nearest organizational step on the way to the first contract, running alongside the work itself, not blocking it.
The method already works and has been measured across more than a dozen pilots. Investment doesn't fix the method — it builds distribution around it: partners, platform, brand.
Arkhitsyn rolls out on a real piece of work in weeks, not months: no new software for the team, with the first verifiable decision record landing already in the first cycle.
Request a pilot